|
But
Zia is also an unexpected man.
I
admired his egalitarianism, or at least his desire to feel at one
with what is generally referred to by that faceless term ‘the
downtrodden masses.’
He
is as eager as a child when the talk gets around to books and
writing. His collection of short stories “In the Ruins of
Solitude” was well received despite it being an introverted and
sometimes harrowing account of the darker side of life "but I
am more focussed now” he says “I am in the middle of planning
and writing a novel.” He won’t discuss the theme or the style
but muses that he may also write, in tandem, a handbook on his
self-improvement programme.
He
is very vocal about Salman Rushdie. He doesn’t like him.
Arundhati Roy didn't deserve the Booker and he doubts if she will
be able to sustain her writing ability.
He
is articulate, refreshingly honest “I never ever follow trends.
I like to shock people.” He does a marvellous and dramatic
reading of a passage from his book. “I never undertake anything
that I don't feel confident about. Writing is all about
sensitivity, connecting, intellect and ideas, ideas, ideas,
ideas…you can be very fluent with a language, but it doesn’t
necessarily mean that you are able to express yourself in writing.
Urdu is also a very expressive language – you can be very
sarcastic, very subtle.” He speaks several languages including
Punjabi, Balochi and French.
Today,
Zia is exuding so much confidence that it is overpowering and I do
wonder if he is in his Leader of the Breakthrough Programme mode.
In this role he helps losers become winners. He urges them with
absolute certainty that they can break out of the mould of being a
victim. He urges them to let it all hang out.
Hold
on a moment – aren’t we already an intensely emotional people?
What happens at his seminars? I imagine a roomful of thirty
people, mainly women all in high hysteria and here is this man
encouraging them to to let it all hang out while he exudes this
unshakeable confidence and strength. It must be very draining.
“It is! It is!” he says “But I am always there to prop up
things.” He wants everyone to interact, to unite as Pakistanis,
be one as a nation and as a people.”
This
is a surprisingly conservative side of Zia, considering that he is
so radical in all other ways. His love for Islam and for his
country is genuine and he quotes several stories to back up his
contention that there is unity and strength if we take examples
from the story of Solomon and the ant, from Joseph and his
brothers, from Moses and Jesus and it is possible for ordinary men
and women to change society and perceptions. He talks about how
Gandhi was able to turn the tide, how Martin Luther King initiated
the process that led to change in civil liberties for black
Americans and minorities. I think, but (!) then all of these
people were assasinated or crucified.
Would
Zia be willing to organise a million man/women march?
He
hesitates and skips the answer.
So
yes, we are back in a full circle, neither of us winning or losing
the argument. But we have had a confrontation of sorts and it has
been as self-revealing as the revelations about the interviewee
and that is why I have written about myself which I rarely do and
perhaps Zia has proved his point that it is possible to initiate
change even if it begins within us and expands from there.
Frankly
without being disarmed in any way, but mostly concurring with him,
this is possibly the first time in my egalitarian life that I am
willing to be persuaded by a charming Balochi feudal lord.
|